Join our Brooklyn Paper electronic mail e-newsletter to get information, updates, and native insights delivered straight to your inbox!
The controversial “City of Yes for Housing Opportunity” handed within the Metropolis Council by a slim margin final week, incomes equal quantities of reward and criticism from lawmakers and residents round New York Metropolis.
Metropolis of Sure will replace a few of the metropolis’s outdated zoning rules, easing the development of latest housing in areas the place it has traditionally been prohibited. Officers estimate it would convey 80,000 items to the 5 boroughs over the following 15 years.
Mayor Eric Adams celebrated the passage of Metropolis of Sure on Dec. 5. Picture courtesy of Michael Appleton/Mayoral Images Workplace
The proposal — which was amended late final month in an effort to achieve extra help from numerous council members — handed 31-20 within the Metropolis Council on Dec. 5.
“Today, the greatest city in the world has been and has decided to become a City of Yes,” Mayor Eric Adams stated after the vote. “This image represents the future. A little more housing in every neighborhood to lift our city out of crisis.”
A decent vote from the Brooklyn delegation
Help for Metropolis of Sure was cut up among the many Brooklyn delegation. 9 of the borough’s 16 council members voted in favor of Metropolis of Sure, and 7 towards.
Council members Alexa Avilés, Justin Brannan, Jennifer Gutiérrez, Shahana Hanif, Crystal Hudson, Rita Joseph, Sandy Nurse, Chi Ossé, and Lincoln Restler voted “aye,” whereas Chris Banks, Farah Louis, Darlene Mealy, Mercedes Narcisse, Inna Vernikov, Kalman Yeger, and Susan Zhuang voted “nay.”
Their votes largely mirrored the need of their districts, or not less than of the group boards inside these districts. Of Brooklyn’s 18 group boards, 11 disapproved “City of Yes for Housing Opportunity,” and 6 permitted. The outcomes of the vote in Mattress-Stuy’s Neighborhood Board 3 will not be accessible on-line.
Brooklynites, too, had been cut up on the amended proposal: some, Brooklyn Paper reported final month, felt that even when it wasn’t excellent, Metropolis of Sure would supply not less than some new reasonably priced houses. Others apprehensive it will displace longtime Black and brown residents who stay in low-density neighborhoods or single-family houses by permitting builders to construct a lot bigger buildings, driving up rents and driving out current residents.
Citing parking points and ‘phantom’ funding, seven Brooklyn CMs vote ‘no’
All 4 group boards in Banks’ District 42 — which incorporates elements of Brownsville, East New York, Canarsie, and East Flatbush — voted towards Metropolis of Sure, and so did Banks.
“It’s not enough just to say that New York City is in a housing crisis,” Banks stated on the Dec. 5 council listening to. “The real crisis is regarding a lack of affordability and a path to homeownership.”
New Jersey Avenue in East New York, the place an outdated church is being become reasonably priced housing. Picture by Susan De Vries
The district has seen a big improve in reasonably priced housing during the last 15 years, he stated, but it surely’s nonetheless “nearly impossible” for his constituents to turn into owners — and he felt Metropolis of Sure wouldn’t do sufficient to handle the problem.
And whereas the council amended modifications to parking mandates, Banks stated Metropolis of Sure might nonetheless permit builders to construct new housing with out new parking, straining the already-limited provide in elements of his district with out quick access to public transportation.
In the end, he stated, his constituents felt the proposal might “irreparably change the neighborhood” and open the floodgates for builders to construct with out concern for longtime residents.
Parking was a significant hangup for Mealy, who stated that with Metropolis of Sure, “developers have absolute power to not do any parking whatsoever.”
Council Member Darlene Mealy stated she was involved about parking, a standard chorus amongst Metropolis of Sure’ opponents. Picture courtesy of Emil Cohen/Metropolis Council Media Unit
“I feel this body has taken our own power away from ourselves,” she continued. “We can’t negotiate with the developers, they can do whatever they want.”
Yeger agreed with Banks, and stated Metropolis of Sure for Housing Alternative was too broad for a metropolis as giant as New York. He was additionally uncertain of the $5 million funding for housing and infrastructure promised by Metropolis Corridor and Gov. Kathy Hochul as a part of the amended Metropolis of Sure — calling it a “phantom $5 million.”
“We can disapprove this one, vote for an actual plan that does this in a real way, and does it in conjunction with the city budget so we can actually achieve the monies we think we’re getting,” he stated.
‘Yes’ voters say all nabes want to assist finish the housing disaster
The seven Brooklyn reps who voted “yes” slammed their colleague’s critiques as they voiced their help for the initiative.
Hudson, who sits on the council’s Land Use committee and voted to ship the amended Metropolis of Sure proposal to the total council final month, stated “some communities are doing their part to address the housing crisis, and others are not. And that’s the real controversy.”
Housing development has been uneven within the metropolis. Between 2010 and 2020, roughly 185,000 new items had been accomplished in multifamily buildings throughout New York Metropolis, in accordance with the Furman Middle. However they weren’t evenly distributed.
Excessive-rise residential buildings in Greenpoint.Picture courtesy of Kidfly182/Wikimedia Commons
Greater than 15,000 new items had been in-built Greenpoint and Williamsburg throughout that point, however solely 231 in Bay Ridge. Roughly 20,000 new low-income items opened within the Bronx and 15,000 in Brooklyn; whereas Queens and Staten Island acquired fewer than 5,000 every.
Knowledge additionally present that whereas low-density districts take up greater than 44% of the overall land throughout New York Metropolis, they home simply 28.4% of all New York Metropolis residents.
Metropolis of Sure is the “bare minimum” to permit for the creation of latest housing within the 5 boroughs, Hudson stated, together with accent dwelling items the place older New Yorkers might age in place close to their households.
“It gives communities and developers alike new options to consider when planning a new project,” she stated. “Let me be clear, these options are just that, options … nothing requires developers or homeowners to build anything.”
The 80,000 new items promised by metropolis officers works out to about 100 new items per council district per 12 months, Restler stated. His district has seen monumental development because the 2004 Williamsburg-Greenpoint rezoning.
“Come to the 33rd District today, there are dozens of projects underway that are bigger than 100 units right now,” he stated, “My district has generated more new housing than any other council district in New York City over the last 15 years. We are doing our part, it has not been easy, but it has been necessary.”
Council Member Chi Ossé criticized his colleagues who voted towards the measure. Picture courtesy of Emil Cohen/Metropolis Council Media Unit
Recent off a win after the council handed his FARE Act almost unanimously final month, Ossé stated members voting towards Metropolis of Sure have beforehand opposed different measures to guard tenants and finish the housing disaster.
In latest a long time, the town has added extra jobs than houses, Ossé stated, and an inflow of latest residents are competing with longtime New Yorkers for restricted housing inventory — driving up costs and in some circumstances, forcing folks out of their houses.
“We cannot as a body and government sit idle and let this city become more and more unaffordable because of those who have continued to say no for decades,” he stated.
